Tests by Ladefoged showed speech and language dependence on feedback without exception; human DNA requires cellular feedback for active protein, that is, everyday living; in tests on volunteers, human endurance under feedback impoverishment has proved lower than for fasting.
As a mathematical model, the Hodgkin-Huxley hypothesis has lost prominence in neurophysiological study. The theory that cell membranes had ion channels yet remains affirmed by Erwin Neher, Bert Sakmann, and Roderick MacKinnon. Cellular and systemic feedback is a fact; its importance approximates a drive.
The work regards feedback as a biological phenomenon at the cellular level, examines its effects within the human nervous system, and analyzes the role in language. The term feedback performance denotes a closed-loop capability. It does not refer to evaluative behaviors that everyday language may connote. The notion of a drive does not involve any sex-oriented function. The work regards human nerve, muscle, and cognitive structures with strictly linguistic relevance. Feel welcome.
Introduction Linguistic ability is a prerequisite for reasoning skills, and neural processes have been evidenced in language learning as well as use. Human language processing can be viewed as human processing of information, where terms as a system, program, and option, though correlative with computer science, cannot imply close a correspondence, since natural language remains a scope of skill unmatched by artificial parsing. Human neurophysiology is the primary reference for the following discourse on the role of feedback in human language command.
Chapter 1. Neurophysiology of feedback 1.1. Feedback in the single neuron; 1.2. Space and time in neural communication; 1.3. Human systemic dynamics; 1.4. A reflex arc; 1.5. Human reflex and voluntary behavior; 1.6. Relevant neuro-motor patterns; 1.7. Sensory compensation; 1.8. The pool model for internal balance; 1.9. Signal specificity and the human brain.