It is by the year 2050 that robotic workforce is expected to prevail.
If Tesla can sell a humanoid for 20 thousand dollars that works 20 hours a day for 10 years — the global economy fundamentally breaks, says a reasonable ■prediction.
Where are people to get the cash for all the great shopping, if there are no jobs for people anymore?
Olden lore
To Confucius, a proper society would be such that all people have some cash. After all the hundreds of years, this might be the only kind of society that has turnover and thrives, when robots do most of the work.
A constitutional integral that sets the cash standard, of course in proportion, could be the very step towards an actually affluent society. Such parity might curb the game of gold and work better than the metal.
Barter is not likely the way in Heaven. You do not have to bring a cucumber to get a carrot in most places on Earth already. Confucian a bit for the sake of horizons, we may doubt a heavenly parity of gold too, though it is by no means regular to wonder about heavenly currencies.
ADVERTISEMENT
About money he said,
It is way better than barter. We may expect there would be some currency in the Great After; a constitutional parity might be a close idea.
A mathematical integral
People have used mathematical integrals since antiquity. Today you have them to calculate average values of curves, and those can graphically represent finance; or, to reckon on antiderivatives. You make your integral definite, to set a limit.
Country accountancy would be mostly graph and pie 2D, whereas the mint would favor three dimensions. Integrals look natural here. They can do the 2D and the 3D.
Is math difficult
If to argue that math is difficult, let us consider, people were by and large underprivileged in ancient times because they could not write or read. Constitutions were “too difficult”, though they had only language. In Egypt, feudal pharaohs deemed writing sacred and thus only for the select, all the plenty of pictures telling the average man or woman not to bother even trying to learn. Today, literacy is the standard also in architecture, and math cannot be too much of a guess about the future.
Feel welcome to my exercise at democracy. The ideas could be of use in many countries.
Virtual Country: Exercise at Democracy
Future of man on Earth
The future of humankind is in creativity. A nice future, if you organize things right. Potentially yet a nightmare of poverty and wars, with economies as today — and mass robotics.
The ■List of stock market crashes shows that what goes up will go down, unless you have that … “something”. Improvement has also happened on Earth, and that “something” has always been free market turnover and a sustainable standard of living.
When there are no jobs for people, payouts are the only way to keep the standard of living and the citizen purchasing power.
Today, some 8 or 9 out of 10 American citizens aged 25-54 are employed to have income (data vary). What happens when robots take most jobs?
Social Security trust funds are estimated to be depleted by 2033, says the ■TransAmerica Institute.
Only high-income families enjoy sizable dividends, shows the ■Urban.org.
Turnover real payouts
If a country, region, or state were obliged to put cash aside proportionally to their market turnover, the percent, from whatever the agreed financial instrument, could provide for payouts for citizens. Money at this large scale certainly is math.
For the market not to be too centralized, regional taxation might recognize arrays, set with regard to local turnover. Good ribbon is good with the haberdasher’s too.
When people have money to spend, people do spend money. This in turn does fuel the turnover and the “commodity-monetary value”.
I am not aware of any plans to return to gold parity with mass robotics; my writing here is generally to reckon on things, and I only sometimes think what the matter about England and Holland in Ukraine could be.
Crimea has declared independence of Ukraine, yet England and Holland keep fueling the conflict. Themselves, they would not be rather doing business under Ukraine, would they?
Apocalyptic that return to gold would be. President of France Emmanuel Macron has already warned of a world war, that such might come from Ukraine involvements altogether.
England possibly wants to keep Scotland, while there is talk with the European Union. It is not fair to force the allegiance on the highlander.
The psychology of gold
Gold has been mostly psychological, for metal and money in real time. Holding gold parity cash in hand you were not holding any gold. Only if a government would follow their promise, you might get some of the metal, yet all along — if you wanted to have gold, your common sense was to buy it.
To give up on banknotes or cash, you give up on the real-time ability to get goods.
It is a constitutional parity to look secure in the context of selling or buying. Many places on Earth bakers would tell you, go to a jeweler’s; here we accept cash.
Imagine we have a computer game where we take up a constitutional parity and we are given 100 units of gold for reference. We’d have to be buying gold just to keep the parity while we have to print more cash for our growing economy.
Any parity apart from a constitutional indication might be as a millstone at the neck. A constitutional parity could be working fine in real-time trade, and nobody could claim — and make sense — that man prints money just to give it away. After all, these are people to make turnover.
Inflation
We could describe money losing its worth as disparity here. When does it happen that goods are expensive and money takes on zeroes for purchase?
- When production of goods is low or costly; it would not happen with mass robotics, especially if you allow regions or states the robotic juridical person for standard of living purposes (the exercise at democracy); the market might even balance then around some basic range for prices as they actually occur; artisan, design, or luxury products would be the exception, but many might become financially more accesible than they are today: basic ranges would not be substandard.
- When you print “empty money”: this would not happen with a constitutional parity. Naturally, there cannot be one mastermind math integral of no living experience to aim at now. As obviously, countries likely would be trying factors for variables of economy according to sector or output territorial prominence. A factor for turnover payouts would be worth including, as those would be making the positive feedback for the turnover itself, safeguarding citizen purchasing power. National bank basic rate would be of course relevant too.
Life and theory
For the “commodity-monetary value” to continue its career in the economy, a constitutional parity would commend trust. You cannot change such things fast or in secret, to speculate.
The Irish surplus for 2024 was to be about 8 billion before ■the Apple tax. Some 25 billion in total it was, according to ■The Irish Times, whereas citizens of the country are some 7 million — enough to put a million for each person in a bank and give them dividend payouts. The people would spend the money and “do the magic” — the turnover.
Without any preferential rates, the amount could be some 400 euros a month, or about 4,800 a year — basic rate from one million allowed to “sprout” — and the government people might get a little extra. Governments should be well paid, to work well.
As long as bank investment is legal, it is no empty cash you print, if you refer to the turnover and the national bank basic rate, including a factor to represent the standard of living payouts with your integral.
The turnover is obviously a high number, so it would be likely a fraction of a percent to discuss and begin with, in terms of the country savings per citizen for the payouts.
In comparison, handing out welfare checks straight from the country coffer might look a bit hasty. The “sprouts” would renew every year, whereas people who have the necessary means are less likely to fall ill.
A citizen to look five million in “sprouts” can buy much more than the one that looks one million. This, comparatively, is simple arithmetic. Giving is receiving, they have said for ages.
The tiny fraction for one person might be mean to deny, and you shouldn’t. If the cash grows into a sizable sum — nature has such phenomena.
It is rather feudal, to think if the people deserve goodness. By nature, also if pumpkins grow big and sweet, their owner deserves them.
Who owns the country turnover? It is natural to share the goodness.
Tycoon brands are nothing without turnover. Even if you made super soft shoes that “fly” people through town, without buyers, you can only forget all about it.
Math really, for everyone to see
It might be actually math to commend trust in the constitutional parity. On the other hand, you suffer the bit of math, and the “sprouting” is very reliable. No speculation or gamble on the parity is even possible.
As Honeybee says, such an economy could be turning until Andromeda at least, if those predictions about the collision with the Milky are true, about some many years from today. If they are not, then longer.
People who fear a baby boom may care to compare statistics for India.
Says AI after the ■Poorvika Medical Foundation, women in the lowest wealth quintile have an average of 2.6 children, compared to 1.6 for those in the highest.
Lower female literacy, limited access to contraceptives, and preference for male children with manual labor are named for the factors. A safeguarded standard of living with mass robotics would not have these factors. People who can join arts and sciences as they like and travel the world without the worry of old-age manual tasks likely do not become “baby boomers”.
Virtual Country: Exercise at Democracy
The PDFs are for any discussion to be peaceful and open. Year 2050 comes in 24 years — years many enough for “sprouts” — whereas inspiration might be simply something that gets you into a good mood for thinking, while it sits somewhere in view.
Honeybee would advise, take it the good way. 人段 is the human factor. Future humanity is possible with the irrational and transcendental ■Gelfond too. People make turnover.
