There has been much myth about government “psychic” research. Anyone fond of fiction and potentially money might imply that those ideas worked.
To compare a human need as eating, they were like breaking your penne in your fingers before cooking: redundant to the taste and potentially damaging to the organoleptic quality.
To regard a human need as something intellectual at least, they were as useless to the mind as the mentioned preparation of food would be to the stomach, and certainly damaging to consistency in thought.
MK Ultra would have made sense, had it found the 10th Buddha. Telling little children it would be defense of the country if they let themselves intimately abused, could be only failure in revising on the ■Blitzkrieg of the Deutsche Wehr. I have not looked up dictionaries to find a ■pun on the US military, as infantry is a term in international use.
The 10th Buddha has been the one never to get irate or angry, and the one to end the world. Apparently, he has not come.
Behaviorism gained prominence with Frederic Burrhus Skinner — what a name, in context with eliciting unconditional response in a human being.
Behaviorism yet possibly began in reaction to Thomas Paine, ■to constitute a man. I do not blame him. Behaviorism has been about control and deity, and Paine never made an attempt at being either. He was not narcissist.
A behaviorist would observe that many people worship a deity. The Bible gives examples of mass punishment; people fall ill and die, children and innocents; and yet the human being would kneel and bow as if facing a presence. The behaviorist would not go figure for God directly — that would mean requirements and expectations — but getting “somewhere in the loop” would do. Unconditional response could be the token, especially when it is a sport for money.
What is the truth about the human being?
Below, a man gnaws and chews on a poison pill. He would rather die than betray his “higher truth”, unconditionally. As showed in the movie, the effects on him and other members of the sect could be obtained with radiofrequency stimulation. Physically, it does not require a waiting room.
The ■”Sender” by ■Wildcat Jones is believably a story about theory.
Well, does human free will exist? Skinner denied it, but he overpowered the individual first. To compare human olfactory abilities, he was like saying that roses did not make a scent because you could not smell them from underwater.
The truth should be a quality a human being can live and be free. Theoretical questions and tenets about truth usually miss out on two basic questions:
1. Is it nature to be proved?
2. Would the truth be lived?
To live the truth, you would not take to building concentration camps. Those were the worst of practical lies ever effected about the human nature — because free, human beings do not grab at barbed wire electric fences.
Roses were naturally giving beautiful scents at the time of WWII, only given the chance. Man living well was real people. You do not close your eyes, to learn to read. The pages are your choice.
The words here are directed at a single human individual. “Everyone must be very hungry by now”.
“Man” and “the human being” are the figures of speech people can use absolutely freely, in expressing thoughts about humanity. “Man” is going to be many people at times, and “the human being” simply would not be otherwise or another. For all people and everyone there are no figures of speech because it never happens that all generally want the same in lifespan. Somehow, this is livable too.
To consider the possibility of human individuality and free will not existing, let us think about inevitable delight. Would it come with ■penne, ■orecchiette, ■farfalle, or ■fusilli?
For the probability of remote psychic talk, I have tried the sounds of speech for the noted shapes of dough in Italian, and they are linked above — for those who like, or have to like, or were born to like languages.
The sounds of Puglia, Emilia Romagna, or Southern Italy — would all sound distinctly from afar. The sound of Liguria, penne, might be misleading.
It yields to observation that some people do not properly appreciate what they’ve got, and this is why they seek the supernatural. If you speak, try an elastic band over your mouth for a day, except meal times. Natural language is just the best, I bet.
Mill or mint, maj. Gen. Stubblebine wouldn’t have appreciated good cutlery. He “required that all of his battalion commanders learn how to bend spoons”, says ■Wikipedia. He was yet unable to continue without government money. YouTube has ■explanations, should anyone get to think they change metal particle structure solely with thought.
Beside money, motives are intimate. Sadly. It is brain tissue to suffer.
The ■mechanoreceptor response here may be indicative of a physical trigger, but hardly of sexual arousal. Women would be paradoxes, and the truth is, women are not enigmas.
Homo erectus or sapiens, the species has evolved using programs like the DNA and intrinsic feedback. Programs are open-loop, and feedback is closed-loop. The self-preservation priority has enhanced feedback, and biological open-loop sequences depend on closed-loop processes even for daily protein.
What follows, there are no archetypes or brain programs really, certainly not like software works in computers. The biggest open-loop chunk in language is a syllable as evidenced in spoonerisms. The “Phoebe” or “Camilla” could be mentally retarded or brain injured, but never “archetypal” or “programmed”.
The last ditch here might be, the “Phoeb/Cam” is for a radiofrequency hostage.
The word map here is my brief note on notions and ideas in Aristotle. How do we “send” a map like this in a psychic way?
If the “sender” has not seen the map before, is it from his or her retinas they send it? If they know the map, do they pronounce the words? Some would be archaic. If both the “sender” and “receiver” know the map, there is no point sending it, of course. Such maps are nothing unusual in linguistics. Reference, and not a dictionary.
Stargate was to be transferred to the CIA, but the agency commissioned the American Institutes for Research (AIR), who “found that remote viewing had not been proved to work by a psychic mechanism”, ■says Wikipedia. The myths did not tell the truth.
The best we can do is to get along with the Great Design and die a natural death, says philosopher Honeybee.
ADVERTISEMENT
About life he said,
Earthly reality may show some heuristics for the lasting or eternal form. Mortality yet cannot demonstrate immortality; like under water, you don’t really smell the roses.