Le Pacifique… C’est beauté

Most French Polynesia coral reefs would be healthy and distant from pollution, says ■Elsevier. There are yet killers other than dirt. Temperatures rise. Corals live in symbiosis with tiny animals too, and higher temperatures can break that connection. The reefs lose color then, or become “bleached”. The heat stress comes in part from humans, that is, the global warming.

It is not only the temperature of water to get higher; water levels have been climbing too. “Climate refugees” becomes a phrase of everyday. “Residents face a tough decision: continue to weather the ravages of rising tides, or relocate and become climate refugees”, say ■France 24.

European Union was created in 1993, notes Wikipedia. Who believed it was possible, before it came to be? Therefore, even if you think it unlikely, consider a union of republics in the Pacific.

Why consider:
It can be very profitable, a good reason to begin with; EU does have the financial advantage;
It can have influence bigger than individual countries, on matters that make sense of course. One such matter could be Earth ecology.

The Pacific happens to be used for tax paradises, and foreign print of banknote gains. With an economic Union, it could be the Pacific print of banknote to gain. ■Euro was simply invented, and started up in 1999.

A union of republics could promote ecology to keep those polar caps properly chill. The chances are much higher than with a single country doing it, or single countries doing it because they have just gotten together for an occasion.

The union would need respect and trust. Therefore, it is important that it does not become a para-military ensemble as NATO today, playing with nukes. The Secretary General, ■Rutte, is by education a historian, that is, nothing military, and his only resolve is to second the UK in their increased spending to fuel the Ukrainian conflict. Rutte is Dutch and his country is a monarchy.

I mean, if you gave it to people for a multiple-choice, if those who play with nukes are (a) military, or (b) para-military in predilection, the para-military is a likely answer: on the other hand, there has not been a nuclear war even though there was the Cold War, and those must have been some military people too, who minded the nukes.

If to speculate on Rutte and anything military: it had to be some parachute, to help him out of ■scandals as claiming kids’ allowance back from families. I am not sure what military to turn to, asking if those parachutes do get worn.

Very seriously, I would not imagine such a union of republics offering weapons to Ukraine and threatening Russia. I would imagine the people talking with Zelensky and persuading him into a reasonable compromise. Russians are not going to give up on access to Crimea. They have had it in centuries, with consent from the locals, because it has been good business.

Reports on “fake” or “forced” voting in Crimea to favor separation from Ukraine have not showed even one photo, reporter — or, an international team… are you dreaming? — to their support. ■Witkoff was called “an ignorant” in Polish media who maybe only never had to answer the question, how it is they presume people would rather be poor. Such idealism is maybe to impress of “the old money”; you act like you were born to a stash and never considered earning in currency, and thus you are not even conscious of the matter. Some people might like to pretend this old cash, though it is nothing superior on this Earth: many enough people do think, me included, earning honest good cash is good wits.

Polish Wyborcza is no rhetoric, because lynch cannot be rhetoric: Putin has got a new friend in the USA. He is a trusted cooperative of Trump (about Witkoff).

(I hardly ever read anything from Polish media, because they use a lexemic comma, and it is as if they could not tell a square from a triangle, see ■The commatoform disorder. The present conflict in Ukraine is the exception, sometimes).

Is it we say “friend” without the person affirming? If the article would have been about Witkoff saying he’s friends with Putin, I’d understand the use of the word. It ■was not.

Those English old cash people probably would not care for Wyborcza — financially? — and thus it must be Wyborcza futile affect, and not be the best of wits:

I know I can earn in democracy, and this is where my proper sentiment is: could there be any point in pretending love for living without means (why, would it be ugly with means). I understand that people need to earn, also in Crimea. Russia remains a much bigger market in commodities and services than Ukraine. Pretended love for poverty cannot be love for democracy.

Crimea was assigned to Ukraine when there was the USSR, and the strong rumor is, Khrushchev was plain drunk; but within the USSR and after, Russia had the access still. Maidan changed it.

All the thing in the Ukrainian war is about Russian regular access to Crimea, and Crimea having their regular access to Russian goods and market. Contrary to Rutte claims, the Russian military have not been the most “outgoing” in type. Not challenged, they have stayed in Russia. They have showed attachment for legal resolves. Withdrawing from Poland, they did not fire even one gunshot, because it was the legal resolve.

Rutte has called for a 400% increase in NATO spending against Russia. How about Rutte goes a desert island waiting for Russians to bring him fresh water? As a bet; he would be free to issue challenges verbal. Would it be that verbal challenges do not work getting Russians on a foreign excursion, a revision on this conflict is necessary.

A world war might break out, if physical and military means become implemented against Russia from NATO. Russia is not going to sit back and wait to get smothered. The UK, promising their ■100 thousand drones, have been aware of their NATO membership. The survival rate for Ukrainian drone attacks has been reported at some 10 percent. They are cruel weapons in cruel hands. The UK say they want to learn from experience!

How have things been on Earth with big wars and their beginnings? You might doubt one guy sick with his lungs could make the beginning for a world war. ■Prinzip was reportedly ill with tuberculosis. Not much of good living remaining, he let himself used by people who did not reckon dignity for democratic people. He shot the kaiser and gave the beginning to WW I.

Escalation with wars can be really fast.

The assault at Sarayevo was an act of desperate cowardice. It could only tell the world the assailants did not have support enough among the people, so they shot the country head, because they did not have the guts to come forward with their idea, or they did not have an idea: in such a latter case, they were just barbarians; if you don’t have a better idea for things to work in a country, let them be as they are.
The republic can be a good idea. Feel welcome to read,
■Constructive criticism.

Possibly, there is not much vision in monarchies today — what to do with robotics, when very many jobs as we know them today are gone. Is the UK about kicking up a world conflict and reducing people in numbers? I don’t know. Things do not look good in the kingdom.

The idea with the link above is, people can make turnover. I don’t need to be a party. It is enough that people are able to read and think. The world can get along with robotics quite well, without limiting people in number, or a war.

A republic, a democracy, always should have the dignity to seek honest prevalence. The good side is, democracy happens to be by nature attractive, compared to guys who can’t understand why you need or plainly like to earn cash.

The UK as a NATO member offering 100 thousand of cruel things to attack Russia — this looks much more than one guy who coughs up. The NATO secretary to wish a 400% rise in spending against Russia, is still more than one desperate and manipulated TB, who you might suspect was infected maybe, because he had the name. Totally used he was, if so.

If there comes to a world war, nuclear weapons are going to be used. Radiation would come to the Pacific, as Earth turns.

There are now an estimated 12,512 nuclear warheads on Earth. A war in which even a fraction of these bombs were detonated would create blast waves and fires capable of killing millions of people almost instantly. The radiation-induced cancers and genetic damage would affect the remaining population for generations, says the ■UCL News.

The nuclear winter cannot be the idea to relieve the Pacific of heat: the strong chill would come with nuclear debris in Earth’s atmosphere; crops would die and there would be famine, see ■Wikipedia.

The Union of the Pacific looks really good (if not super good) in comparison: UP, in the acronym. Anyway, as you please. This here is just ideas. I have only fancied the Pacific to keep my old bones warm. The place on Earth is real pretty too, worth saving from damage, as some other places as well.

I agree with Thomas Paine, it is important that people have an object in view, that people can see what things could look like. Two poster pages if you like. A republic is a republic.

Virtual country
Exercise at Democracy

All member countries could be really republics. Look at Tonga. It is a “unitary parliamentary semi-constitutional monarchy”. Politically hodge-podge. Even if “parliamentary democracy” happens to occur about Tonga, there is no way you could have a king for the head of a republic. A republic can have a president for the head, no other. It is very important where real signatures come from.

We do not have to begin from scratch. Learning from experience, provided that peaceful, is possibly the best. We can pattern after the USA Constitution. Think, people in that country have had guns, and the Constitution has survived more than 200 years. There has to be something good and working about it, to make it the longest lived constitution on Earth.

The thing is not in just rewriting things, of course. The double jeopardy might be not necessary, if the constitution says the people are free of any requirement the law does not bring, and the Judicial is uniform: one verdict is enough for all the country, and you don’t get sued from regions individually. You’d have to demand the jeopardy in a bill… Feel welcome to read, ■When it is murder.

Myself, I feel like being original about my works in literature, but if someone wrote the human being has the right to breathe, and it would be an idea to make the law, I would not feel like rephrasing. This is why my draft constitution keeps correspondence with the USA writ. The word writ continues as reference for writing; it is not a royalist tradition.

For business, this could work well. A guy comes around, compares the constitution, and it is easy to tell if the law has this, or if it has that, because the writ is almost as from a template. If the guy does not like the constitution, there may be no business; but if the constitution is good, there can be plenty of business.

June 13, ■Israelis attacked Iran. I am never going to understand this in person, but the Israeli maybe have some inner disquietude whenever a country. Their shooting rockets into Iranian nuclear facilities is not possibly a safe practice.

Zelenskyy is the first Jewish president of Ukraine; with Volodymyr Groysman as prime minister, Ukraine became the first country other than Israel to simultaneously have a Jewish head of state and head of government, says ■Wikipedia.

The Ukrainian conflict might be actually a world war in the cooking, full blaze.