Introduction

Language is a prerequisite for human reasoning abilities, and neural processing has been evidenced in natural language learning as well as use. Human parsing for language can be regarded as human processing of information, where terms as a system, program, and option, though correlative with computer science, are not to imply close a correspondence, since natural language may remain unmatched by artificial intelligence. Human neurophysiology opens the following discourse on the role of feedback in human language command.


Living organisms use DNA-encoded information, for growth and sustention. These genetic codes have been compared to programs (Young, 1984), where a program may be understood as a system plan for an automatic solution of a problem (Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, 1989). Biological life depends on structure regeneration (Young, 1984). Homeostasis, in requiring inner biochemical selection and exchange of no direct conscious adjustment, may exemplify a biological task.


In biology, systemic selection and exchange may involve a single cell and structures as complex as the human 
being; DNA patterns for active protein production have been acknowledged as biological programs. Even basic sequences of cellular activity do rely on feedback for enactment (Vander et al., 1985), feedback in information processes to have been defined as returning of part 
of the system output to be reintroduced as input (Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, 1989).


Positive and negative types of feedback have been recognized, where the former is also known as regenerative feedback and aids the input, whereas the latter opposes it, hence the alternate term, “inverse feedback”. Cellular outputs accrue into schemata that allow learned behaviors; integrated neural patterns can 
be thus posited to rely on feedback for formation, effectuation, and permanence.


Regarding control in routine operations, Norbert Wiener insisted that feedback belonged with neuroscience as 
well. In neurophysiology and psychology, feedback productiveness can be understood as a closed-loop capability over open-loop sequences (Puppel, 1988, 1996). No less than a requirement by the nervous system, intrinsic feedback must be of effect in the neural reality for natural speech and language. The system is studied with focus to feedback phenomena in the cellular, intercellular, and interschematic dimensions, toward speech and language generally.


For a competent insight into natural language, the inquiry refers to human communication as well. Psycholinguistics 
to make the framework of the intended pursuit, feedback phenomena are studied in language learning and use, 
the discourse further to reason on compensation or repair, within the posited language faculty of man. Natural and principled occurrence having become affirmed in human neural and psychological function, feedback reliance can be argued to approximate a drive, the relevant instinct being that for individual self-preservation. In the view to human information processing, feedback would be an initiating, mediating, and modeling factor.

From the glossary
Language faculty: the ability or skill along with the material component, as the visual faculty to embrace the eyes, or the mental faculty to engage the brain; Chapter 3 has the language faculty include the brain with human organs for speech and language (cf. the articulators).

The sense in the Latin ■facultas joins the intellectual and the material, deriving from ■facilitas, where I recommend my ■Travel in Grammar.

■THIS TEXT IS ALSO AVAILABLE IN POLISH

---

More:
■Chapter 1. Neurophysiology of feedback 1.1. Feedback in the single neuron; 1.2. Space and time in intercellular communication; 1.3. Human systemic dynamics; 1.4. A human reflex arc; 1.5. Human reflex and voluntary behavior; 1.6. Relevant neuromotor patterning; 1.7. Human pooling of sensory information; 1.8. The pool model for human homeostasis; 1.9. Signal specificity and the human brain; 1.10. Conclusions.

---

---

Natural language may remain unmatched by artificial parsing. Sophia is only an input-output device, capable of trading lexical items and responding with verbal routines. Part of the definition of a natural language is that it is language by humans. See the Conclusions.

I have never been interested in robotics and Sophia remains an it to me, a thing with a female name. I do not understand why the United Arab Emirates granted citizenship to an emulation of human personality.

---