Manually fractured penne

There has been much myth about government “psychic” research, like those ideas worked. Well, if the ambition is to manipulate human behavior, the operative might be amused here: the guy chews and gnaws on a poison pill, in order not to betray his “higher truth”, whereas all the “higher effect” came with microwave, injury, or both; we only do not get to see the operative — is a plausible theory.

Wildcat Jones “Sender” is properly a theory story. What if human brains had multiple speech and language areas, actually to allow multiple personality. Well, and what if people had multiple stomachs. Slicing or cutting up couldn’t do, just like you wouldn’t get to have many more legs or hands.

I am going to present a few more of those movie theories and my exercises in abstract thought right after.

I learned at school, it was primary school seventh grade physics I believe, there is no way around propagation really, for messages on this Earth. Whether you imagine a particle or a wavelength, also scents need something to get by, to be smelled, that is, to propagate. World Science Festival would point to quantum fields, regarding “smell” under water.

Learned human sayings are mostly about attributes, quantities and qualities for the “some thing” to work. In my simple words, you could talk if delight is to come with penne, orecchiette, farfalle, or fusilli, provided you have dough.

Is there truly psychic propagation in this world of matter?

I have tried the sound for all of the noted shapes of dough in Italian, and they are linked above — for everyone to try too, if they like. Between the sounds of Puglia, Emilia Romagna, or Southern Italy, the most difficult is the sound of Liguria, penne, for remote psychic talk. Other names would sound distinctly Italian even from afar, but penne might be misleading.

For audible speech, sound formants need to propagate, and on Earth they usually do in air. Things as composed as letters of alphabets, these have historically employed footmen, later replaced by people with horses and carriages for long distance — as soon as people had dough enough for horses and carriages to make sense in the postal business.

Mill or mint, dough looks an important factor. Sponsor to paranormal research, Maj. Gen. Stubblebine “required that all of his battalion commanders learn how to bend spoons”, says ■Wikipedia. Here is a video on methods online. It is probably for reasons as dough that spoons are not produced already in the shape.

Must have been dough, to make the MK Ultra. The idea came from Nazi concentration camps, where chemistry and whatever else were supposed to result in a “truth serum”. Hitler was not a sane person: divided Germany resulted from his strategies of six years; more, there’s never been “syntactic chemistry” in the human body, and people have things as question tags or double negatives — this was all the time obvious.

“Under the guise of defending our country”, says a victim of MK Ultra about the underage mind control and sex experiments. It looks a kind of negation, by the experimenters, on country intelligence and armed forces: seven-year-old service to the country? — As if there were no CIA, FBI, or US Army. Whatever the age, no country could make sense, demanding that a human being gives up on own mind.

I like it about the Great Seal, that taking the Latin generatively, as Franklin, Paine and many others learned it, we may translate into a rhyme also a child could remember. Out of many, one; Favor to the endeavor, A new people come. Any person born in the U.S. is a citizen, says the Constitution.

The truth will set you free

I have never been persuaded about the CIA motto, interpreted as above. Truth may take away part the comfort that myth happens to give. On the other hand, if you get to live by a magic box, you cannot set it to standby, and this you can do easy, if you accept the box is just a phone, no magic. Let us try a little bit of truth, though it may not be much hope for magic.

Human bodies biologically prioritize own survival. The brain is priority number one. There has been much talk about programs and evolution, but the truth is that biology allows programs only as far as they serve intrinsic feedback, the biological and psychological ability to cope in variable environments. Without it, the heart and the lungs could go own separate ways for rhythm, or we would stumble, walking; we wouldn’t be able to speak, write, or read at all.

The importance of this feedback ■approximates a drive, or, if you follow behaviorist terms, it is a drive, but then you accept privation as an objective factor, whereas most people would favor colors of spring, that is, ■life’s what you make it. My perspective has always been psycholinguistic and anti-behaviorist: there is so much more to human language and thought than behaviorism can embrace.

Nobody can volitionally hold own breath, but people remain capable of suicide by drowning: approximation is a fair term, I guess. Intrinsic feedback takes no substitute. It is not a sex drive.

Prioritizing feedback abilities, the body does not program for archetypes, or store programs. For speech and language, the largest extent for an open loop sequence remains that of a syllable. Ability to talk is a high, if not one of the highest priorities in the human mind; therefore, what the brain would not do for speech and language, it would not do for Disneyland either. Bye bye, stories of mind programs.

Programs are open-loop, because they take their course beginning to end without looking to anything else. Feedback is a closed-loop capability, and it can be very variable. In the human body, even basic protein depends on intrinsic feedback to start its open-loop and make bodily protein.

Science has been in contrast to spirituality for quite some time, but another bit of truth is that if people have souls, science becomes travesty to deny it, failing miserably at objective picturing human reality. Intrinsic feedback is capacious. It may as well hold in a soul. Just one, of course. No substitutes. There is no need to measure. In mind, letter b is neither bigger nor smaller than letters c or m, and this is objectively the truth.

Neuroscience has recently looked to what there is not filled in the human brain, found microtubules, and went wondering on consciousness.

Let us get back with observations on language and factors. The little word map here is my brief note on notions and ideas in Aristotle. Even if we decide to think as abstractly as to omit the question of propagation in this physical world, how do we “send” a map like this to a psychic?

If the “sender” has not seen the map before, is it from his or her retinas they send it? If they know the map, do they pronounce the words? If both the “sender” and “receiver” know the map, there is no point sending it, of course. Such maps are nothing unusual in linguistics. Reference, and not a dictionary.

The impression is, there has always had to be another factor in purportedly “psychic” communication, a technological factor. If it was microwave, it would have caused the “archetypes”. Dependence on intrinsic feedback means biological orientation to it. In case of privation or distortion, compensation might impress as alternate and involuntary behavior, or suspended function. The brain is an organ.

For speech and language, Ladefoged proved dependence on intrinsic feedback without exception. If you interfered people talking, as you muffled the sound or limited hearing, the speech became different. He could have noted those altered qualities as “proto-paradigms”, but he decided, adequately as can be, the values were altered qualities only. His experiments were honest, informed consent, and no microwave.

There is a big difference between linguistics and behaviorism. Linguistics cannot cheat, because false result is punishment: without a real thing, you have nothing; you can’t check out. Behaviorist “archetypes” may be microwave products completely: their thing is nothing like a language standard that man in the street knows.

Let us think about intrinsic feedback as part that biological resolve for own survival. This is the thing not to let anyone hold own breath to die. It sure does not care for opinion, and would not make exception for speech and language either. More, there is no common core of experience to all people on Earth, and an archetype would have to try being such a core — unless you take recourse to the knee jerk, but then you do not need all that expensive psychological practice.

Well, Stargate was to be transferred to the CIA, but the agency commissioned the American Institutes for Research (AIR), who “found that remote viewing had not been proved to work by a psychic mechanism”, ■says Wikipedia.

Was money all the motivation for “psychic research” as above? Was it ever about sexual behavior really? Alas, the ■mechanoreceptor response as in the video below may be indicative of microwave or another physical trigger, but it does not prove sexual arousal. On the other hand, fortunately: in this state of mind, such arousal would be proof of inborn predilection for suffering in the entire human species.

Mother Nature made nipples neurologically easy for the sake of babies that need to feed. Human males are proof to the simplicity too, when it’s cold: in both genders, mechanoreceptors respond to smooth muscle, involuntary and reflex action upon low temperature. It is arguably an advantage, under normal circumstances of course, that humans do not need special focus or technology for feeding own offspring, and males would have more than one embellishment.

Where low temperature can, something else (that is not sexual arousal) might too, as mechanoreceptors are mechanoreceptors.

Human sexual arousal is fundamentally centrifugal, from the brain, and not centripetal, from the nervous system periphery into ■the CNS. The Latin cognates mean “from the center” (centrifugal), or “to the center” (centripetal). Without the brain initiating any such process, we could be talking only about sensory response, and that is not the thing: merely salivation or another secretion? — human body is some 80% water.

Awkward, because the picture would be for someone else than the object himself or herself, experiments as in the movie might serve showing “arousal” where the person is not aroused, they only have the sensory response. Theoretical much enough to me, as to why and what for, as I imagine the predilection story could turn out slippery to the very experimenters themselves.

The nature of human predilection is pleasure. The video here above is not sexually attractive to most humans I believe, thus dough remains for the only realistic and not an all-too-theoretical motive, in “psychic” experiments as presented. Classical music alone obviously does not shut heads down or bring them up as in an epileptic fit, and verbal behavior as saying “resume” could not be the thing you need to finish eating. Brain injury under influence might be non-verbal in response.

Governments should ban all human object or target operations from secrecy: there are always going to be people to go plainly for cash, if the state occasions such venues. Believably and imaginably, operatives wouldn’t have empathy or compassion: if it takes it, you break the fusilli; delight is a matter of taste when you go for tinkering with human heads, or so it is possibly realistic to reckon about such hired participants. If the matter ever becomes leaked or noticed, Congressional or Parliamentary hearings may come many, many years after.

There could be arguments as fighting crime or espionage, but you’d have a hung jury or allow appeal, rather than put an innocent under an executioner, or so would read the law. For espionage, paradox would be, the guys mostly get caught on communications, sending letters or such, because there is no psychic really way for them to call home. There is nothing wrong with monitoring a P.O. box, when you have a warrant.

Exercise at abstract thought: Man you see first is Man who fears nothing

We do not need to go “sender jellyfish”, to think what there might intuitively be of that everlasting importance to the mind. The line here in the heading does not come from an experiment. It is select thought from an eighteen century book ■about Confucius.

Behaviorism has been built entire on fear: of injury, impediment, all those things that “trigger”. Man who fears nothing will hear no news, nor would they care for comment. The kind of Man cannot be of this world.

We may recall Thomas Paine: “I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of”. 

We can be non-believers, agnostics, even atheists, and yet there is not going to be ground to deny that people may have had a few intuitions at least, on the After. The exercise here would be to think we face the Man who fears nothing, will hear no news, and would not care for comment.

I prefer to believe I have a soul. Living as biology only — would be too limited. Facing that One to see first, I would be probably reckoning what I could have thought better about before, on Earth, and well, I would rather not have much remorse.

A behaviorist might reckon too, what it all could be worth. Whatever we discover about mortal matter, we are bound to quit. It is thought that may live forever.

Exercise at abstract thought: What is for all of humanity, is for king of any Bongo as well

There has been much ideology on Earth. Not all was good. Stalin was an ideologist. Hitler was a man of ideas. Importantly, ideologies are not moss that spreads wherever there is water. Ideologies grow with governments. Otherwise, they are just ideas for living. More or less, the USA government could not go hippie, and this is why the Flower Power remained a movement.

Pious fraud may look attractive at times, and some people would say it is for a good purpose, but should any government come to considering a psychic ideology on Earth ever, as the “Mother” idea for all humanity in the “Sender”, there would be two strong arguments against it.

First, “psychic” ideas favor impulse over intellect, and these are brains to make the revenue. Second, people conditioned to live with an ideological or technological compromise are less immune to adversity. In other words, if a king of a Bongo made a lot of cash and wanted to try things “metaphysical” on a country like the USA, citizens would be likely incapable of discernment, as whose microwave it is, or that it is human technological activity at all. ■Here is the song.

There could be an entire catastrophic movie, about a “psychic” society where illicit experimentation is uncontrollable and people mutate genetically in the end, as chromosomes aberrate in excess microwave and the DNA picks up. I hope the exercise might work without such visions, unless there would be someone to make a good movie.

The human shape is quite a nice optimum. Life wouldn’t be better with two heads or six hands. I’ve never heard about anyone with an idea better than natural, anyway. I don’t believe in any metaphysics in this physical world except the book after Physics in Aristotle.

In a compromised society, technologically naive people would compare to the youth here, in another movie, ■Found. He says, “I don’t see any wires”, about a mobile phone. Today, mind melds are showed with wires.

My idea for my living is reasonable philosophy, no melds or hive minds. Human progress has been about intelligent individuality where ends meet, within the law, in a market.

There is yet so much we people do not know about the universe or After, that calling my story a fable is no exaggeration. Importantly, if a fable is good, you can live with it better than without a story, or with a story you would not choose. Feel welcome to my ■Fable of philosopher Honeybee, where you do not need to come near a hive at all, if this is not your preference. Life’s what you make it. Work in progress.

Exercise at abstract thought: north and south are arbitrary

We may remember the story of Jonah and the whale. Jonah wanted to be prophet, when the one that some people say was God asked, “should not I spare Nineveh, that great city, in which are more than threescore thousand persons, that cannot discern between their right hand and their left?”

Earthly atlases have been used to show the west on the left hand side, and the east on the right. I do not remember exactly the rumor, but those were military quarters where someone hanged the map of the world upside-down, purportedly of course (and I saw it over the Internet), during World War II.

It would have made the east go the left hand side, only if the north and south were universal values. They are not, as NASA may affirm already on the role of the head when a space station turns, or so I guess about the left and the right rather than east or west hands.

Ideology people would often talk about “higher” values, or going “beyond”. The perspective is always vertical, and sometimes we could imagine there is a little ladder somewhere, for the ideology guy to climb in mind, whereas righteousness is a word derived from notionality closer to the horizontal plane.

Should human rights be under any discernment other than own value as laws? I think there is no ingenuity, intellect, or faith — on Earth or elsewhere — to have priority or value beyond human rights; but I wouldn’t put things one on top of another, or over and beyond: the interesting idea is the preposition AT.

Another abstract part (beside potentially arbitrariness of verticality) would be coming with a thought that earthly maps of the skies are not agreed or consulted with other civilizations, where the left or the right do not have to be decisive, so the exercise does not need to go there, unless there would be someone to make a good movie, again.

MK Ultra and other behaviorism should not be allowed to break or crush humanity. They should be strictly prevented. Manually to be cracking penne — a human being might be paid to have it for a job, but still there is not going to be sense or meaning to the activity. Humanity will not lose a thing, giving up on behaviorist experiments as above.